Influence of fibre length, dissolution and biopersistance on the production of mesothelioma in the rat peritoneal cavity

A range of respirable man-made mineral fibres were tested for evidence of carcinogenicity by injection into the peritoneal cavity of male SPF Wistar rats; and differences in carcinogenicity were related to the dimensions and biopersistence of the injected fibres. The fibres tested included an amosite asbestos, a silicon carbide whisker, a special purpose glass microfibre, and a range of other man-made vitreous fibres (MMVFs) and refractory ceramic fibres (RCFs) from the TIMA fibre repository. The injected dose of each was designed as the estimated mass required to contain 109 fibres >5μm in length, as determined by optical microscopy. The numbers of long fibres (>15μm) contained in these doses ranged across fibres from 0.1×109 to 0.8×109 fibres; the number of long fibres thinner than 0.95μm ranged from 0.015×109 to 0.4×109. The treatment groups contained between 18 and 24 animals. Animals were killed when they showed signs of debilitation. At autopsy, the diagnosis of mesothelioma was usually obvious macroscopically. Otherwise, histological examination of peritoneal organs was used to search for early tumour development. Judged by median survival time, four of the fibre types, in the doses administered, presented higher mesothelioma activity than amosite asbestos. The other fibres tested were less carcinogenic than the amosite. Only a ceramic material derived by extreme heating to simulate the effect of furnace or oven conditions, produced no mesotheliomas. Attempts were made, using regression models, to relate these differences to fibre dimensions and to measures of durability from separate experiments. The results pointed principally to a link with the injected numbers of fibres >20μm in length and with biopersistence in the rat lung of fibres longer than 5μm. Improved quantification of the relative importance of fibre dimensions and biopersistence indices requires experimentation with a range of doses.

Publication Number: P/99/11

First Author: Miller BG

Other Authors: Searl A , Davis JMG , Donaldson K , Cullen RT , Bolton RE , Buchanan D , Soutar CA

Publisher: Oxford University Press,Oxford University, Oxford,Oxford

Download Publication

COPYRIGHT ISSUES

Anyone wishing to make any commercial use of the downloadable articles on this page should contact the publishers of the journals. Please see the copyright notices on the journals' home pages:

Permissions requests for Oxford Journals Online should be made to: [email protected]

Permissions requests for Occupational Health Review articles should be made to the editor at [email protected]